KATHMANDU,
NOV 13 - Nepal Rastra Bank Governor Yuba Raj Khatiwada said on Wednesday that
the country’s private sector could generate resources through public limited
companies to invest in the infrastructure sector.
Since
the country’s private sector has been doing business by establishing mostly
private limited companies, they have not been able to generate low-cost
resources from the public. They usually depend on bank loans for capital which
are usually expensive. Except for banks and financial institutions (BFIs) and
insurance companies, and lately hydropower companies, most of the successful
companies in the production business have not gone public. BFIs and insurance
companies are required to be public limited companies by law.
Addressing
a session entitled Investment Climate in Nepal at the Nepal Infrastructure
Summit 2014 organised by the Confederation of Nepalese Industries (CNI),
Khatiwada said that people would not trust the private sector as long as it
seeks to collect funds through private companies. “Things can change if you
establish a public limited company,” Khatiwada said.
Believing
that lots of resources could be collected within the country to invest in the
infrastructure sector, International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private
sector arm of the World Bank Group, and the Asian Development Bank have
obtained the government’s okay to issue local currency bonds worth $1 billion.
However,
CNI Vice-President Anuj Agrawal said that the country’s private sector lacked
expertise in mega projects in which they had recently become involved. Nepal’s
private sector started investing in hydropower only after 2006 when it had not
developed even a single road project.
Exemplifying
the success achieved by the country’s private sector in cement manufacturing,
tourism and hydropower, among others, Agrawal said that Nepali developers were
slowly strengthening their capabilities.
Meanwhile,
secretary at the Ministry of Urban Development Arjun Kumar Karki said that
attracting foreign direct investment (FDI) in the infrastructure sector was a
must as it was capital intensive. “We have a capital deficit, and we should
create a system where foreign investors do not have to run from table to table
of government offices,” he said.
Karki
also urged quick decisions from the political leadership and a culture of
encouraging bureaucrats who can make decisions quickly.
Former
Indian ambassador to Nepal Rakesh Sood was impressed by the latest development
in the country’s hydropower sector. “If the encouraging development in the
hydro sector continues, Nepal will be out of load-shedding in the coming 18
months,” Sood said.
Among
the latest developments, Nepal and India have signed a power trade agreement
(PTA) enabling the two countries to trade power like any other commodity, and
Investment Board Nepal and GMR Company of India have signed a project
development agreement (PDA) for the 900 MW Upper Karnali Hydropower Project.
Sood
said that Nepal needed to learn from past mistakes and work on building
confidence among investors.
Meanwhile,
speaking at another session entitled Sectoral Reform post PDA and PTA, Energy
Secretary Rajendra Kishore Kshatri said that the government was mulling
unbundling the Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) as part of sectoral reform and
establishing two separate entities to look after national transmission and grid
connectivity and trade power in the near future.
Kshatri
added that the Ministry of Energy (MoE) would be taking the Electricity Act and
the Regulatory Commission Act to Parliament soon, and that once they were
enforced, things would start to change.
Similarly,
NEA Deputy Managing Director Sher Singh Bhat said that the government
immediately needed to reach a decision to mitigate issues like land acquisition,
write offs, forest clearance and political force majeure that would surface in
the days to come.
“Since
Nepal has signed a PDA with GMR for the construction of the Upper Karnali Hydro
Project, the government may have to pay compensation if the necessary steps are
not taken on time,” Bhat said. He added that there was a need for a regulatory
mechanism and open access to the transmission system to produce better results
in electricity trading.
Likewise,
President of the Independent Power Producers’ Association Nepal (Ippan) Khadga
Bisht said the formulation of an amended Electricity Act and Regulation
Commission Act was a must to guide sectoral reform in the energy sector.
“India
and Nepal embarked on sectoral reform in the 1990s. Since then, India has made
significant progress while Nepal is stuck in the guidelines formed in 1992,” he
said. While India is talking about 1,200 kV transmission lines today, Nepal is
talking about 400 kV and has been stuck at just 132 kV for a long time now, he
added.
No comments:
Post a Comment